Jersey Devils Sign Kovalchuk for 17 YEARS.


Kovalchuk: on the books until I'm 38.

The National Hockey League is crazy.  Nothing shows that more than yesterday’s signing by the New Jersey Devils of left winger Ilya Kovalchuk to a $102 million, 17-year contract, another example of the limitations posed by the hard salary cap in the sport.

The enormity of Kovalchuk’s signing, as well as other stars like the Blackhawks’ Marian Hossa and his 12-year contract, is something that boggles my mind, as I grew up caring mostly about baseball and, to a far lesser extent, football, where $100 million deals are the norm, and usually are spaced out over five years.  I understand the salary cap in hockey is tough, as displayed the rash of trades made by the Blackhawks since winning the Stanley Cup, but this just seems absurd to me.

Of course, this can always prove to be a shrewd signing by Devils president and general manager Lou Lamoriello, as Kovalchuk has been the league’s leading scorer since 2001.  But, y’know, sports stars can age very quickly.  Tack on nearly two more decades and this deal could sour quickly.

But I’ll just have to get used to these things if I want to expand my sports horizons.  Because there’s no way in hell I’m going to put up with this crap.

3 Comments

Filed under Sports

3 responses to “Jersey Devils Sign Kovalchuk for 17 YEARS.

  1. It’s amazing how the GM’s keep giving these massive contracts to players. I know you want the player but isn’t there a point where you think enough is enough. 17 years is unbelievable, I thought it was like a typo or something when I read it at first. These players are very good players, but as they get older it’s going to pose a problem as their play declines. Also, you think you could check out my article relating to this? I really want to hear your thoughts http://chrisross91.wordpress.com/2010/07/20/note-to-nhl-gms-this-is-getting-out-of-hand/

  2. Hey again, I actually completely agree with your comment that they should ban contracts up to a certain amount of years and 8 seems pretty reasonable. They need to stick something in the Collective bargaining agreement that does this because it would be much better for the NHL if something was done

    • Agreed. It might even make players more productive into their later years. I understand these guys are always competitive, but if there’s an extra monetary incentive to play better, I bet they would.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s